LABELING CONTOURS

| "Now pay attention to this, Lou! If we want to know the
elevation of any of the lines, all we have to remember is that the first
one (the one on the outside) was at sea level - elevation 0'! And
because we pretended that sea level rose by 500 feet each time, as we go
inland, away from the sea, each line that we hit is 500 feet higher than
the one before!" |
 |
 |
 |
"What we have is a contour map!
The painted lines are topographic contours:
lines of equal elevation (height above sea level). So, we have contours
at 0', 500', 1000' and so on. We have no contours above 3500' because
the highest point on the island, the peak of Mt Ginger, is only
3998'above sea level! It never reaches 4000', which would be the next
contour!" |
 |
"If we had made sea level 'rise' by 250 feet each time
(instead of 500 feet), we would have had twice as many contours! They
would have been at 0', 250', 500' and so on! " |
 |
 |
"But you can see it gets
to be a bit messy, what with all those numbers! Instead of labeling
every line, we can let everyone know the vertical distance between the
contour lines! We call that the contour interval,
abbreviated C.I.!"
"Then all we do is label
every fifth contour, starting with the zero contour. We also
make the labeled lines heavier! People can do the counting on their own
and the map is easier to see!"
"Notice, by the way,
that the elevations of contour lines are always whole
number multiples of the contour interval! If the C.I. is 250',
then there are contours at 0 x 250' (=0'); 1 x 250' (=250'); 2 x 250'
(=500'); 3 x 250' (=750')....! If the C.I. was 20', then there would be
contours at 0 x 20' (=0'); 1 x 20' (=20'); 2 x 20' (=40').... Get
it?!" |
 |
| "I get it! Putting it another way, if you take the elevation
of a contour line and divide it by the C.I., the answer must be a whole
number! For example, if the C.I. is 40', then you can have a contour at
1800' (1800'/40' = 45), but not at 1900' (1900'/40' = 47.5')!" |
 |
 |
"But I have this question! How do you know what contour
interval to use when you're making a map??!" |
 |
"Well, it's a toss-up, Lou! As you know, on a contour
map, the only points whose elevations you know exactly are those
that fall on contour lines (the brown dots on this map) or have
been specially surveyed (such as the top of Mt. Tom). For the
rest of the points, all you know is that they must have values
between the elevations of the nearest contours! " |
 |
 |
 |
"If we want to narrow down the uncertainty for the
points that don't lie on contours, we can increase the number of
contours by reducing the contour interval! Now, for example, the
dots that fall within the pink area have elevations between 800'
and 850', instead of between 800' and 900'! Even better, more
features will be shown on the map! For example, two blue hills
show up in the green area that you couldn't see before!" |
 |
| "So why just reduce the contour interval from 100' to
50'?! Why not make the contour interval 25' or 10' or even
smaller? That way you'd be able to see everything!!?!" |
 |
 |
"Not so! If you make the contour interval too small,
you'll have so many contours that you can't read the map!! For
example, for the region above 850', I've made the contour
interval 5'! The result is you can hardly see anything! The
contours all blur together!" |
 |
| "So like so many things in life, Lou, you have to
reach a compromise! You choose a contour interval small enough
to show things that are important to you, but not so small as to
make the map illegible! In an area with little relief,
you use a small contour interval, otherwise nothing shows up on
the map! For an area with great relief, you use a large contour
interval so that you don't obscure all the features in a sea of
contour lines! For maps where part of the region is flat and
part is rugged, then you can use different contour intervals for
different parts of the map! But that's not done too often!" |
 |
|
| "But I have another question! I can see that we know the
elevation of any place that falls right on a contour line, but how do we
know the elevations of places that are not right on a contour
line?!" |
 |
 |
"You can't know their elevations exactly, but I'll show you
what you can do! First you have to figure out the elevations of the
contour lines between which the place lies. Look at point A! It lies
between the zero contour and the 250 foot contour lines! If you think
about our story of sea level rising, you can see that A would get
drowned before the 250 foot level was reached! So A is greater than zero
but less than 250 feet! In the same way, B is between 1750 and 2000
feet! As for C, it lies above 3000 feet - and since there is no 3250
foot contour there, it means C must be less than 3250 feet!" |
 |
 |
"And this is what it looks like on the contour map!" |
 |
 |
"Notice, by the way, that any place inside
a contour line is HIGHER than the contour line!
And any place outside a contour line is LOWER
than the contour line! So, since the green dots are outside the 700'
contour, their elevations are less than 700'. The blue dots are inside
the 700' contour and so are higher than 700'. But the blue dots are also
outside the 800' and so are lower than 800. That is, the blue dots are
between 700' and 800'. And the red dots are inside the 800' and so are
higher than 800." |
 |
 |
"And of course, all the points (brown dots) that lie right on
the contour lines have the elevation of the contour line! I can see
that! But how much higher than 800' can the red dots be?!! And how much
lower than 700' can the green dots be?" |
|
| "Well, since the contour interval (C.I.) is 100 feet, the next
higher contour would be the 900 foot! But because there is no 900'
contour, the land must never get that high! If the contours could
be there, they would be there! Contours are
never left out! So the red dots can be any value that is greater
than 800 feet and less than 900 feet." |
 |
"Similarly, because there is no 600 foot contour, the land
must never get that low! If the contours could be there, they would
be there! Contours are never left out! So the
green dots can be any value that is less than 700 feet and more than 600
feet!" |
 |
"Let's look at a bigger area now! You can see that there are
two separate 700' contours, one around Mt. Tom and one around Mt. Tim!
You can see that Mt. Tim never reaches 800 feet as there's no 800'
contour there! And Woodland Valley never gets as low as 600 feet
otherwise there would be a 600' contour! " |
 |
| "This is driving me dotty! But where are all the lower
contours? The zero, the 100', the 200' and so on?!" |
 |
 |
"Well, if we extended the map to show a large enough area,
eventually it would show where the land meets the sea! Then you'd have
all the lower contours!" |
 |
 |
"Now let's return to Mt. Tom and Mt. Tim! Suppose the map
looked like this! I've added a new contour (in pink so you can see it
easily. Let's call it contour 'D'. What do you think the elevation of
contour D would be?!" |
 |
 |
"I'm not sure! I mean, the D contour could wrap around either
way!" |
 |
"There could be a little hill to the east
that the D contour wraps around and encloses! If that's the case, the
area inside the D contour would be higher than Woodland Valley, just
like Mt. Tim! So the elevation of the D contour would be 700 feet!" |
 |
 |
"But it could be that the D contour wraps around the other
way, to enclose a higher area to the west! And
when it wraps that way, the D contour lies outside the 700 foot
contours, so it must be the next lower contour! It must be the 600 foot
contour!" |
 |
| "So how do we know which of the two maps is right?!! Does the
higher area that the D contour wraps around and encloses lie to the west
or to the east? Is D 700' or 600'??!!" |
 |
| "Lou, you amaze me! You are absolutely right! If a contour
hits the edge of the map and that's all the information you're given,
then you just don't know how it goes or what its elevation is!" |
 |
 |
"Actually, however, even if the contour leaves the map,
sometimes there is a way to tell which way the contour goes and which
side of it is the higher area! Look at the river! (I've shown it in
blue!) If we knew which way it was flowing, then we'd know which side of
the contour was higher and which was lower! After all, rivers flow
downhill! So if the river flows towards the east,
there couldn't be a hill to the east because the river would have to
flow up the hill! And rivers don't do that!! Right?! And if the
river flows towards the west, then the area to
the west would have to get lower, not higher!" |
 |

Our thanks to Professor of Geology, David Leveson at
Brooklyn
College
, CUNY
for his kind permission to use this copyrighted material.
http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/geology/leveson/core/linksa/maptop.html
|